Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.


Walters Prize Time

View Discussion
Dan Arps, Explaining Things,  (detail) Fiona Connor, Something Transparent (please go round the back) II, (detail) Alex Monteith, Passing Manoeuvre for Two Motorcycles and 584 Vehicles for Two Channel Video Saskia Leek, Yellow is the Putty of the World, detail

One might assume that the more spatially and conceptually totalizing projects like those of Arps, Connor and Monteith might have a clear advantage over Leek, a mere dauber, but actually, not so - it could take only one painting (that really excited Todoli) to swing it her way. One single work to make him utterly weak in the knees and so-called ‘conceptual rigour' might get thrown out the window.



2010 Walters Prize

Finalists: Dan Arps, Fiona Connor, Saskia Leek, Alex Monteith

Selection panel: Ron Brownson, Jon Bywater, Rhana Devenport, Kate Montgomery
International judge of winner: Vicente Todoli


24 July - 31 October 2010

So now we have the fifth Walters Prize, the last to be presented in the New Gallery. That will disappear when the new municipal building opens next year. And this time it is an all K’ Rd show line up, suggesting that the event is a local occasion - not a national one - but for the fact that Kate Montgomery was part of the selection process (she’s the Director of The Physics Room in Christchurch). So that should quieten any possible murmurings.

All the original exhibitions were very good - according to what I wrote when they occurred, and I think so still - but the interesting thing now is to see how the chosen artists have responded to the challenge of transferring their projects to the New Gallery space: what modifications they have made when considering the architectural properties of the site.

For his revamped version of Explaining Things Dan Arps was given a pristine space with a large floor to ceiling window that brings in a lot of light. His work looks very ordered here; in fact all the elements look as if they are positioned within a three dimensional grid - as though locked within an invisible Sol Lewitt installation of stacked cubes. There is a sense of bodily logic to their placement, within the height and width of the room, that was not apparent in the original Gambia Castle space. The grungy, wildly earthy side of Arps’ practice is still apparent within his often charred and smeared sculptural items (shown on plinths) but nevertheless it is tightly checked. It is as if he enjoys being in a ‘white cube’, and wants to besmirch it a little - but not overdo it.

Fellow Gambia Castle-ite Fiona Connor has created an entirely new work, realising that doing something in a new site based on her utterly brilliant Lett Gallery-based Something Transparent (please go round the back) would only lead to disaster. She has a space with two oppositely placed doorways that you look through but not enter.

Connor showcases the roof struts and girders of the New Gallery by replicating them at floor height with white painted MDF, and displaying them alongside the fluoro lighting trays that bounce light off the tilted ceiling to illuminate the art indirectly. The cunning of her work lies in the fact that it seems to be a Billy Applelike critique of ‘given’ exhibiting conditions, and that the (putatively) distracting structural triangles are to be seen in the other artists’ spaces which she has slyly colonised. Her work hovers within the upper regions of their sites through the ubiquitous struts, and exposes the politics of competitive group shows where one artist can easily (or inadvertently) subvert the endeavours of their colleagues.

When I first saw Alex Monteith’s Passing Manoeuvre with Two Motorcycles and 584 Vehicles for Two Channel Video at St Paul St., I thought it was easily upstaged by the other racing circuit works in the show with more channels and more bikes. However this New Gallery version, with its comparatively small space, really succeeds with its two adjacent projections - based on two cameras: one on the front bike aiming behind and the other on the rear bike aiming forward. I am more impressed with it now, especially with the screen’s tightness on the single wall, and am intrigued by the bikes’ illegal manoeuvres weaving in and out of two rows of motorway traffic at pre-work rush hour.

The work is a very distant cousin of Bruce Nauman’s 1970 Live-taped Video Corridor where a person walking between two close and parallel walls can watch in front an image of their movement filmed from behind. We see the bikes simultaneously film each other so that they advance and recede consistently in size - without the inverse spatial relationships on two monitors of say, Nauman’s moving vertical figure.

Saskia Leek has the most difficult problem of all the artists because the Walters Prize is traditionally oriented towards installation. Her challenge is to have a presentation where her paintings make an impact using the un-Ivan-Anthonyish, institutional architecture that lacks a domestic or intimate feel. She has a good selection of work that is carefully positioned, but the even lighting reflected down from above (pointed at by Connor) tends to suck the chroma out of her already tinted pigment, replacing it with a more pale gauzy haze. They had a more optical, gruntier impact in her original show.

So the big question - the crassest, most vulgar and overtly silly of conversation topics (which of course the more dignified and superciliously sensible EyeContact readers [like yourself] will now choose to ignore) - who is the favourite?

Well we don’t know much about the judge’s taste, do we? One might assume, for example, that the more spatially and conceptually totalizing projects like those of Arps, Connor and Monteith might have a clear advantage over Leek, a mere dauber, but actually, not so - it could take only one painting (that really excited Todoli) to swing it her way. One single work to make him utterly weak in the knees and so-called ‘conceptual rigour’ might get thrown out the window.

Attempted second-guessing is pointless. We have to wait and see.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email


This Discussion has 2 comments.


Matthew Arnold, 2:44 p.m. 9 August, 2010

Go Saskia and her paintbrush.

Reply to this thread

John Hurrell, 2:18 p.m. 11 October, 2010

Here are the some comments by Vicente Todoli - about each of the four finalists, one at a time.

Alex Monteith

“For what could be described as a hyper-real road movie
as well as a tightrope walking performance.
In her twin video projection,
Alex presents an amazing choreography
between two huge engined centaurs -
as they interpret their geometricised dance
to the music of horsepower.”

Dan Arps

“For the transformative power of this artist’s vision -
Dan’s alchemical display
involves all our senses.
Reversing Jules Verne’s story
Around the World in 80 Days
we could say that his installation
takes us on a metaphorical trip
around the day in eighty worlds.”

Fiona Connor

“For the dialectical transference and occupation
of gallery space.
Through the use of meta-spatial trompe l’œil
her sculpture both rejects us and attracts us
as spectators in what constitutes a comment
on the ambivalent relationships between the artist
and the art world.
In Fiona’s case, what you see
is not what you get.”

Saskia Leek

“For turning the heroics of the modern avant garde
into a very intimate and contemporary painting exercise
where the structure of colour
becomes a threshold between
four intersecting worlds -
the abstract and the figurative
the real and the imagined.”

For his more detailed view of the winner, look at the Arps and Budd thread.

Reply to this thread

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

Deborah Rundle, Optimism of the Will, 2018, (detail) two fluorescent tubes, battens, vinyl cut text, courtesy of the artist

Paean to Gramsci




Deborah Rundle
Are We Not Ready?

1 December 2018 - 10 March 2019

The installation of YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES' Asia is for Poor Slobs, 2014, at Te Uru. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Language Fusillade





Some Graphic Sex, Heavy Drinking, Bloody Violence, and Dirty Language

24 November, 2018 - 24 February, 2019


The Latest ‘White Fungus’


White Fungus #16


Edited by Ron Hanson
Art directed by Mark Hanson

Published in Taipei, Jan 2019


A Digression is Not a Distraction




Time to Think Like a Mountain

Issue #3, Split / Fountain 2018