Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Gloriously Ambiguous Ingram

AA
View Discussion
Installation of Simon Ingram's GAN Painting at Gow Langsford. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Pedestal Sea Anemone Pomegranate Thatch, 2020, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Pedestal Sea Anemone Pomegranate Thatch, 2020, detail, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Installation of Simon Ingram's GAN Painting at Gow Langsford. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Radio Telescope Television, 2020, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Radio Telescope Television, 2020, detail, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Installation of Simon Ingram's GAN Painting at Gow Langsford. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Stonewall Alp Cliff, 2019, oil on paper, 785 x 710 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett	Simon Ingram, Stonewall Alp Cliff, 2020, oil on canvas,	900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett	Installation of Simon Ingram's GAN Painting at Gow Langsford. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Chest Fountain Barber Chair 2020, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Mask Volcano Pyjama, 2020, oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Simon Ingram, Kelp Mountain Lamp, 2020,  oil on canvas, 900 x 800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett

These sensual works—with their pre-programmed mark-making methodology—seem to be a form of surrealism. Dreamlike, they look gorgeous with their impeccable rows of marks that are a perfect ‘tesserae' size within the 900 x 800 mm canvases. They are also baffling. As mysterious objects, they would be very rewarding to live with: because of the way they constantly prod the ocular imagination when what Ingram calls “out of range” forms start being shaped by associative mental templates.

Auckland

 

Simon Ingram
GAN Painting

 


9 September - 26 September 2020

The seven (mainly) coloured robot-generated paintings Simon Ingram presents here in the back room of the Gow Langsford Kitchener St Gallery, carry on from his works on paper exhibition a year earlier at Bowerbank Ninow. With the added colour and switch to canvas these newer works look now more like a type of weaving than a sort of Pointillist etched print.

Using found photographic images that are filtered through a reordering brush-mark programme, the resulting paintings are highly ambiguous in terms of recognisability. Each viewer creates their own interpretation. For me, Chest Fountain Barber Chair is about high-rise city architecture, Stonewall Alp Cliff a pirate with a parrot on his shoulder, Radio Telescope Television a helmeted spaceman in a computer lab, and Kelp Mountain Lamp a group of farm animals balancing on a plinth. Chances are (if you visit) you will disagree with me entirely.

These sensual (minutely modular) works—with their pre-programmed mark-making methodology—seem to be a form of Surrealism. Dreamlike, they look gorgeous with their impeccable rows of marks that are a perfect ‘tesserae’ size within the 900 x 800 mm canvases. They are also baffling. As mysterious objects, they would be very rewarding to live with: because of the way they constantly prod the ocular imagination—when what Ingram calls “out of range” forms start being shaped by associative mental templates.

Interestingly—to analyse the robotic process (not the viewer’s mental ones)—when comparing the 2019 black and white version on paper of Stonewall Alp Cliff with the 2020 coloured canvas version, whilst the brush-marks are identically positioned, colour and types of grey are not correlated via tonal value. In other words, Ingram is using a 2D spatial / topographical (mark-positioning) correlation, not that of intensity of reflected light.

Ingram here is teasing his audience. Two other works (again, one black and white, the other coloured) are tonally correlated, for both Kelp Mountain Lamp and Mask Volcano Pyjama have very similar (but not identical) brushmark positioning formations. He has presented them as different entities.

These intriguing paintings owe a little to James Cousins in the way that viewer distance is a key factor in mental engagement, though not as extreme. Each work’s modular peculiarities—where the repeated (different-shaped) brush-formed ‘dots’ are arranged in horizontal rows—exert a constant pull as indicator of a ‘controlling’ robotic intelligence; a scheming mastermind planning image disruptions for his ‘slaves’ to execute in his studio.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Jae Hoon Lee, Mother and Child, 2024, inkjet on smooth pearl. 1500 x 1500 mm

Looking Through (or At) Jae Hoon Lee

IVAN ANTHONY GALLERY

Auckland

 

Jae Hoon Lee
Internal Landscape Part II


16 March 2024 -13 April 2024

JH
Outside installation of part of Shiraz Sadikeen's The Natural Rate, at Treadler. Photo: Alex North.

Sadikeen @ Treadler

TREADLER

Auckland


Shiraz Sadikeen
The Natural Rate


8 March 2024 - 23 March 2024

 

JH
Still from Marcus Coates, The Directors: Lucy (2022) Single channel HD video on loop, projection, 21 min, 24 sec--⁠presented at Yellow Brick Road, courtesy of Artangel.

Attempting to Describe the Experience of Psychosis

Te Tuhi /Auckland Arts Festival

5 inner city sites


Marcus Coates
The Directors


24 February - 24 March 2024

JH
Ava Seymour, Manhole, 2023, Maribu solvent screen-printing ink on aluminium, 1120 x 910 mm, unique.

Maternal Appurtenances

COASTAL SIGNS

Auckland

 

Ava Seymour
Heels of Mothers


14 March - 13 April 2024