Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Optically Volatile Paintings

AA
View Discussion
Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #10 - #13  acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper, all 2125 x 1225 mm Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #2 - #5, acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper, all 2125 x 1225 mm Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #1, acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper, 2125 x 1225 mm Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #6 - #10, acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper, all 2125 x 1225 mm Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #10 and #11,  acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper, both 2125 x 1225 mm Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #7 - #13, acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper Coen Young, Studies for a Mirror #2 - #7, acrylic, marble dust, enamel and silver nitrate on paper

These rippling buckled sheets of ultra glossy paper look strangely like thin, burnished copper, bronze or at times gold - that from some angles seem tarnished with a dirty oily film to introduces a vague iridescence. The optically variable surface is extraordinarily subtle, and depends greatly on the source and direction of the ambient light. The natural variety is far better than electrical for seeing the detail in the marks, though artificial may introduce a wider chromatic range.

Auckland

 

Coen Young
Studies for a Mirror (MAY)

 

23 May - 21 June 2015

As part of the evolving process of growing interaction between Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand art communities, this new Fox Jensen exhibition introduces a young Australian artist who was recently given the award for Best Emerging Artist in the 2015 Redlands Konica Minotta Art Prize.

For his first exhibition here, Coen Young presents a baker’s dozen paintings on paper that have been framed and put under glass. They feature a process that causes their surfaces take on the voluptuous sheen of mirrors, created by brushing on a sequence of layers. The substances in order are gesso, black enamel, marble dust, and then silver nitrate, that top layer becoming activated by the addition of water to darken when left over time. It is finally fixed with acrylic resin when a deepening tone is finally attained that is desired by the artist.

These rippling buckled sheets of ultra glossy paper look strangely like thin, burnished copper, bronze or at times gold - that from some angles seem tarnished with a dirty oily film to introduce a vague iridescence. Young‘s optically variable surface is extraordinarily subtle, and depends greatly on the source and direction of the ambient light. The natural variety is far better than electrical for seeing the detail in the marks, though artificial may introduce a wider chromatic range.

If you let your eyes adjust and scrutinise the dark evanescent surfaces you soon find the works are quite individual, with different vertical and/or horizontal patterns of striations, shoals of flecks, randomly scattered knotlike pits (as if in tar) and wisps of dribbly asymmetrical stains. Sometimes the intricate linear configurations are not uniform but on one half - or one side - of the vertical paper rectangle, and not the other.

All these of course are competing with the dominant, undulating, mirrored sheen - and consequently can initially only be detected with difficulty. The resisting silvery surface and blackish (almost green) hues look like a combination of a dense graphite drawing and a fairground mirror with the reflective surface of a daguerreotype.

It is this graphitelike quality that really intrigues: works made by brushing on (a painting method) to paper (a drawing support). They look unnervingly like very very dense, shiny pencil drawings with horizontal graphite lines. There is the fascination, the paradox. We see none of the matte flatness of acrylic wash or the abruptly choppy - but smudgy - sheen of oil paint; confused further by the overlaid glass and your own reflection peering in. The manuality (and how the marks are to be interpreted) is puzzling - and this is what draws you in.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Deborah Rundle, Optimism of the Will, 2018, (detail) two fluorescent tubes, battens, vinyl cut text, courtesy of the artist

Paean to Gramsci

TE TUHI CENTRE FOR THE ARTS

Pakuranga

 

Deborah Rundle
Are We Not Ready?

1 December 2018 - 10 March 2019

JH
The installation of YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES' Asia is for Poor Slobs, 2014, at Te Uru. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Language Fusillade

TE URU

Titirangi

 

YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES

Some Graphic Sex, Heavy Drinking, Bloody Violence, and Dirty Language


24 November, 2018 - 24 February, 2019

JH

The Latest ‘White Fungus’

Taipei

White Fungus #16

 

Edited by Ron Hanson
Art directed by Mark Hanson

Published in Taipei, Jan 2019

JH

A Digression is Not a Distraction

SPLIT / FOUNTAIN

Auckland

 

distracted-reader
Time to Think Like a Mountain



Issue #3, Split / Fountain 2018