Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Four Large Shin Paintings and a Room

AA
View Discussion
Jeena Shin: Motus I; Motus III; Motus IV - all acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus I, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm; Jeena Shin, Motus III, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus III, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm; Jeena Shin, Motus IV, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus IV (installed), acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus IV, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus III, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Jeena Shin, Motus IV, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm; Jeena Shin, Motus II, acrylic on canvas, 2400 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Shin's three dark paintings dominate this show with their sense of cavernous space and descending fluttering leaves or birds. The single pale work though has a very different feeling, being so much brighter and less cluttered. It is also more complex in its tonal structure, having five or six nuanced varieties of white, made with various layers systematically reapplied, while the black works have what appears to be only one variety of dark gray.

Auckland

 

Jeena Shin
Motus

 

15 December - 23 December 2014

This show of four large works, all the same size, in the large lower Two Rooms gallery, seems to be a continuation of the moves Jeena Shin made in the planning and execution of her two murals that were presented to the public of downtown Auckland last April at Herald Theatre and Peach Pitt. Her compositional processes - using repeatedly overlapping scalene triangles that hint at folding - are much more overtly intricate now, with the observant viewer attending to small details such as little isolated islands of triangular shape or abrupt changes in (masked off) edge direction. The paintings with white backgroounds are more complex than the dark ones.

As is often said, Shin’s canvases are fiendishly difficult to photograph, the information they exude being so dependent on raking light’s (especially natural light) effect on traces of tape edge, the sheen of carefully incorporated varnish, and very thin overlays of acrylic. Each work has its own compositional ‘personality’ in terms of tumbling or (more) static movement, though three are dominated by black background fields and the fourth - much airier - by white.

So studying their flickering angular forms, with their ubiquitous sharp corners and splintery slivers - swirling like broken shards accelerating out from exploding windows - they appear to have a barely detectable underlying structure of long beams or diagonally extended planks, now camouflaged beneath various layers of overlapping hovering triangles that often seem to be sinking towards the bottom of the stretcher. Jumbled afterimages in your overheated retinae float out over the adjacent white walls.

Shin’s three dark paintings dominate this show with their sense of cavernous space and descending fluttering leaves or birds. The single pale work though has a very different feeling, being so much brighter and less cluttered. It is also more complex in its tonal structure, having five or six nuanced varieties of white, made with various layers systematically reapplied, while the black works have what appears to be only one variety of dark gray.

It would be interesting to swap the ‘white’ work - which is positioned on the wall nearest the entrance doors and windows - over with the dark one on the opposite (most ‘interior’) wall, just to see what would be revealed in terms of tonal subtleties, even when the room is also awash with electrical light. Natural light - and each work’s position to it - appears to be crucial, for these don’t seem to be discrete objects where our experience of them can be separated from their location in the gallery, and repeatable anywhere. Location inside ‘art-friendly’architecture, in relation to instreaming or deflected natural light, is paramount.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Gordon Walters, Untiled, 1974, 430 x 485 mm. Image courtesy of the Walters Estate

Walters Gouaches, Collages and Drawings

STARKWHITE

Auckland

 

Gordon Walters
From the Archive


5 February - 29 February 2020

JH
Noel Ivanoff, Levigation, 2020; Katharina Grosse, Untitled, 2001; Christine Reifenberger, Robe, 2016; David Thomas, From the Impermanances Series "The Movement of Colour / Dark Red", 2018; Christoph Dahlhausen, Bodies, 2018. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Colour vs Paint vs Support

TWO ROOMS

Auckland


International group ‘abstraction’ show of 13 artists
WestFabre: Paint vs. Colour
Curated by Christoph Dahlhausen


31 January - 29 February 2020

JH
Zac Langdon-Pole, Te Whananui-A-Hei / Cooks Beach 12.06.2019, 2019, sand photogram (1000% enlarged), made with sand from Te Whananui-A-Hei / Cooks Beach, Aotearoa New Zealand, archival hahnemühle fineart print, 3012 x 3940 mm

Langdon-Pole’s Celestial Avian Guides

MICHAEL LETT

Auckland

 

Zac Langdon-Pole
Interbeing

 

29 January - 29 February 2020

JH

Illuminating Xin Cheng Booklets

Xin Cheng

a seedbag for resourcefulness

 

A set of five illustrated booklets

 

Materialverlag-HFBK Hamburg, 2019