Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Monash Exchange With Canterbury

AA
View Discussion
Undercurrent at SFA Campus Gallery. On the floor, sculpture by Louis Patterson, on walls, works by Neale Stratford and Catherine Laudenbach. Neale stratford, In My Father's Footsteps. Digtial print. Catherine Laudenbach, please be careful:Belango State Forest (Road). Digital print. Undercurrent at SFA Campus Gallery. On floor, Louis Patterson, on walls, Suzanna Watterson, Ian Jones and Michel Kemp. Undercurrent at SFA Campus Gallery.Works by Geordie Allardice and Josephine Jakobi Ian Jones, Transition from the visible to the imagined from the visible to the invisible 1-6, pen on ink wash on paper Geordie Allardice, Art Machine & Lapping it Up, detail. Louis Patterson,Interrogation, recycled cardboard, mixed media. Suzanna Watterson, Escape, laser-cut acrylic and glue. Michel Kemp, Collage Man Jennifer Murray, Caterpillar. Acrylic on paper

Yet this show seemed so disparate in its focus, its works too diminutive and portable (and lacking in ideational wallop) to have any real impact in the space. More muscular three dimensional work would have engaged more successfully with the gallery dimensions.

Christchurch

 

Geordie Allardice, Josephine Jakobi, Ian Jones, Michel Kemp, Catherine Laudenbach, Jennifer Murray, Louis Patterson, Neale Stratford, Suzanna Watterson


undercurrent: a trans-Tasman exchange

Curated by Julian Holcroft and Rodney Forbes

 

28 September - 13 October 2010

This is one of two linked shows that the University of Canterbury Art School has done in an exchange with Monash University in Victoria, Australia - its Gippsland Centre for Art and Design. This display by a group of Australian students was assembled by Julian Holcroft and Rodney Forbes, while the other of Christchurch students was put together by Robin Neate.

Shows like these are difficult to comment on because in many ways a student is not a true artist until they have freed themselves from the influence of their teachers and long left the university. Of course that sounds terribly simplistic, for it can be the other way round, with teachers absorbing ideas from their pupils (such as when say, Christchurch icon Bill Sutton was influenced in the late fifties by Ted Bracey), or that students have an independence in their practice and a maturity of thought right from the start.

So given that this selection of Australian work was seen in Christchurch in quite a different context from that in which it was made, it was very good to have a chance to ponder over some of what is currently being produced in Melbourne. Yet this show seemed so disparate in its focus, its works too diminutive and portable (and lacking in ideational wallop) to have any real impact in the space. More muscular three dimensional work would have engaged more successfully with the gallery dimensions.

Looking at the individual artists, Neale Stratford’s photographs of workmen bagging pieces of asbestos managed to convey a chilling mood while Catherine Laudenbach’s series of images within Belango State Forest were more ambiguous in their Lynchean sense of an immanent danger or the uncanny.

Josephine Jakobi’s images of handmade toy horses lined up in patterned array against landscape backdrops revealed what a shame it was she didn’t install them directly in the Canterbury space or outside it, while Jennifer Murray’s little acrylic paintings on paper of ships and colourful machinery at work in Antarctica really needed to be published in a book as a much larger series.

Geordie Allardice’s whimsical art machine had folksy overtones of H.C.Westermann and Jim Nutt, but with purchasable items - like folded t-shirts - placed on the plinth seemingly to make the work a portable sales bench too. Louis Patterson’s cardboard construction of a chair and battery used for torture referenced Ricky Swallow, but looser in finish (perhaps as a sort of sick pun on shaking chairs), while Ian Jones’ pages of intricate patterned ink drawing needed to be larger to have more presence.

The highlights of the show were Michel Kemp’s organic and richly detailed, flowing collages that seemed to ooze along the wall like floating leaves, and Suzanna Watterson’s plastic road and shop signs with glued-on lettering that as oddly terse poems in the public space, contained peculiar phrasing that twisted conventional direction-giving awry. Kemp and Watterson’s contributions had a confidence that drew you back for repeated viewings in an exhibition that overall whilst not particularly dull or boring, wasn’t earth-shatteringly exciting either. In other words, nice to check out but somewhat anaemic.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Deborah Rundle, Optimism of the Will, 2018, (detail) two fluorescent tubes, battens, vinyl cut text, courtesy of the artist

Paean to Gramsci

TE TUHI CENTRE FOR THE ARTS

Pakuranga

 

Deborah Rundle
Are We Not Ready?

1 December 2018 - 10 March 2019

JH
The installation of YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES' Asia is for Poor Slobs, 2014, at Te Uru. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Language Fusillade

TE URU

Titirangi

 

YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES

Some Graphic Sex, Heavy Drinking, Bloody Violence, and Dirty Language


24 November, 2018 - 24 February, 2019

JH

The Latest ‘White Fungus’

Taipei

White Fungus #16

 

Edited by Ron Hanson
Art directed by Mark Hanson

Published in Taipei, Jan 2019

JH

A Digression is Not a Distraction

SPLIT / FOUNTAIN

Auckland

 

distracted-reader
Time to Think Like a Mountain



Issue #3, Split / Fountain 2018